I find it hard to applaud ignorance in action, because that's what axing $1.6 billion in state funding for education amounts to, but while he's on a roll here, perhaps Governor Corbett should consider taking his plan to the next logical step – abolish all education funding and do away with public schools. People who want their kids educated can make their own arrangements. Those who don't won't! No more school boards and teacher unions. No more property taxes and no more silly debates on whether we value the future of our children or not. Governor Corbett's budget makes it clear that we don't, so let's stop this idiotic charade and just admit that we'll be satisfied with a dumb-downed populace, as long as it means we don't have to sacrifice tax dollars to educate our neighbor's children.
In the interest of fair disclosure, I'm a bit jaded on the subject, but I acquired that viewpoint by experience. I earned a Pennsylvania State Teaching Certificate after graduating from Millersville University in 1978 with a degree in secondary education, but after one year in the classroom, I came to realize that no amount of money can adequately compensate a teacher for their efforts. People who think differently have never taught in a public school classroom.
That said, I do appreciate John Q. Public's reluctance to fork over money to educate the little snot-nosed kid down the street who will probably be leading this country one day, because nobody want the likes of him to do a better job than we're currently doing, unless it's messing with his kid's future. That kind of ignorance is priceless!
Monday, March 21, 2011
Thursday, March 17, 2011
AMERICA'S UNPOPULAR WAR
Ask anybody on the street to identify America's least favorite war, and the Vietnam War might garner the most votes, but judging by the prevalent view of today's conservatives, the War on Poverty takes that honor, hands down. Rush Limbaugh famously commented that the War on Poverty was the stupidest war America ever fought. That pretty much says it all when it comes to the conservative view of social spending in America today.
Conservatives in America are fond of calling themselves Christians, but when it comes time to enacting Christ's social gospel, the party platform is basically "Jam-it Jesus! If you want the poor to eat, feed them yourself!"
There's a great editorial written last month that discusses the historical development of the war on poverty. It's an enlightening read at the web address listed below. That a moment and consider its message.
http://mobile.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2011/02/04/reagan_war_on_poverty/index.html
Conservatives in America are fond of calling themselves Christians, but when it comes time to enacting Christ's social gospel, the party platform is basically "Jam-it Jesus! If you want the poor to eat, feed them yourself!"
There's a great editorial written last month that discusses the historical development of the war on poverty. It's an enlightening read at the web address listed below. That a moment and consider its message.
http://mobile.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2011/02/04/reagan_war_on_poverty/index.html
Sunday, March 13, 2011
MORE WESTBORO FOLLOWERS THAN YOU THINK
The Supreme Court's Westboro decision illustrates that all Americans pay a hefty price for the privilege of free speech and ought to serve as a rude awakening to the fact that being the target of hate speech is not a pleasant experience. As patriotic Americans, we grieve the loss of fallen soldier, Matthew Snyder, and as decent human beings, we mourn with the Snyder family for the grief they have suffered, but let's not forget that the heart of this matter involves one group of people attempting to demonstrate their hatred for another using our most fundamental of rights – the freedom of speech.
Free speech is a powerful tool. It exhorts individuals to seek the loftiest of quests. It inflames individuals to commit the vilest atrocities. It can build. It can also destroy. It creates fear. It calms. It illuminates the mind with reason. It stabs the heart with hate. Such is the strength of the spoken word.
We are understandably appalled by Westboro's brutal and insensitive message of hate leveled against a family and a nation in the midst of deep personal suffering and tragedy, but everyone who feels embittered by the Westboro decision should take a moment to reflect upon those occasions when they too have engaged in hate speech similar to the kind of bile Westboro peddles. It's not a comfortable assessment to undertake, but honest reflection reveals that Westboro followers have plenty of company, millions in fact.
Just ask any homosexual about an anti-gay marriage rally, or a Hispanic immigrant about our immigration debate, or a black person about the n-word, or an Islam adherent about racial profiling, or a poor person in need of food stamps and a Medicaid card to simply survive, or even a liberal living is a sea of unapologetic conservatism. They know hate when they hear it, and it isn't confined to the outskirts of a funeral procession. It's in their face every day - at work, at school and at play. It's on the TV. It's on the radio and every other place where free speech is exercised. And for most of those individuals, free speech hurts. It hurts because they know that free speech provides a license for people in this country to express their anger and hatred in a way that demeans and disrespects other individuals and causes them pain. Westboro followers are closer than you think. The nearest one may be as close as your mirror.
Free speech is a powerful tool. It exhorts individuals to seek the loftiest of quests. It inflames individuals to commit the vilest atrocities. It can build. It can also destroy. It creates fear. It calms. It illuminates the mind with reason. It stabs the heart with hate. Such is the strength of the spoken word.
We are understandably appalled by Westboro's brutal and insensitive message of hate leveled against a family and a nation in the midst of deep personal suffering and tragedy, but everyone who feels embittered by the Westboro decision should take a moment to reflect upon those occasions when they too have engaged in hate speech similar to the kind of bile Westboro peddles. It's not a comfortable assessment to undertake, but honest reflection reveals that Westboro followers have plenty of company, millions in fact.
Just ask any homosexual about an anti-gay marriage rally, or a Hispanic immigrant about our immigration debate, or a black person about the n-word, or an Islam adherent about racial profiling, or a poor person in need of food stamps and a Medicaid card to simply survive, or even a liberal living is a sea of unapologetic conservatism. They know hate when they hear it, and it isn't confined to the outskirts of a funeral procession. It's in their face every day - at work, at school and at play. It's on the TV. It's on the radio and every other place where free speech is exercised. And for most of those individuals, free speech hurts. It hurts because they know that free speech provides a license for people in this country to express their anger and hatred in a way that demeans and disrespects other individuals and causes them pain. Westboro followers are closer than you think. The nearest one may be as close as your mirror.
Friday, February 25, 2011
TEA PARTY CANCER CONTINUES TO SPREAD
America is being eaten alive, and from within, by a cancerous tumor called intolerance. It is fueled by the selfishness of a growing mass of individuals who yearn for a country of 8 million like-minded citizens instead of 350 million diverse people whose myriad opinions deserve respect and recognition. If left untreated, it will destroy the very principles our nation was founded to champion: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness for all, not just for a selective few.
The cancer I refer to is America's Tea Party movement, the militant arm of the GOP.
When Georgia Republican Congressman Paul Braun was holding a town hall meeting yesterday and was asked by a Tea Party activist, "Who's going to shoot Obama?" the staunchly conservative Congressman's knee-jerk reaction wasn't to chastise the questioner for posing such an inappropriate suggestion. No, the Congressman's reaction was to score points with the sympathetic crowd by reminding the questioner that in 2012 he'd get a chance to vote Obama out of office.
Of course, later on, after Congressman Broun realized that his inappropriate response had touched off a political firestorm, he claimed to have been too stunned by the question to fashion an appropriate answer, but that claim rings hollow when you consider that Congressman Broun is a seasoned debater who is well-skilled at the art of verbal jousting. Broun knew exactly what he was doing when he played to his adoring Tea Party crowd by dignifying the assassination question with an answer that did nothing to chastise the sentiment being expressed by the questioner he faced.
The Tea Party follower who questioned Congressman Broun simply uttered the words that many Tea Party supporters are hoping in their hearts – that Obama will be killed and his supporters will be relegated to the back-burners of history. That doesn't sound like the Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness for all principle that Jefferson espoused, and that's because it isn't. Followers of the Tea Party are only looking out for themselves, and as far as they're concerned, the rest of us can go to hell…and the quicker the better.
The cancer I refer to is America's Tea Party movement, the militant arm of the GOP.
When Georgia Republican Congressman Paul Braun was holding a town hall meeting yesterday and was asked by a Tea Party activist, "Who's going to shoot Obama?" the staunchly conservative Congressman's knee-jerk reaction wasn't to chastise the questioner for posing such an inappropriate suggestion. No, the Congressman's reaction was to score points with the sympathetic crowd by reminding the questioner that in 2012 he'd get a chance to vote Obama out of office.
Of course, later on, after Congressman Broun realized that his inappropriate response had touched off a political firestorm, he claimed to have been too stunned by the question to fashion an appropriate answer, but that claim rings hollow when you consider that Congressman Broun is a seasoned debater who is well-skilled at the art of verbal jousting. Broun knew exactly what he was doing when he played to his adoring Tea Party crowd by dignifying the assassination question with an answer that did nothing to chastise the sentiment being expressed by the questioner he faced.
The Tea Party follower who questioned Congressman Broun simply uttered the words that many Tea Party supporters are hoping in their hearts – that Obama will be killed and his supporters will be relegated to the back-burners of history. That doesn't sound like the Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness for all principle that Jefferson espoused, and that's because it isn't. Followers of the Tea Party are only looking out for themselves, and as far as they're concerned, the rest of us can go to hell…and the quicker the better.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
DUPING CONGRESS - MIND GAMES FOR THE MINDLESS
I guess it should come as no surprise that the United States Army has been accused of using psychological operations personnel to attempt to influence U.S. Senators who visited the war operations in Afghanistan to win increased funding for the war effort. After all, if the Taliban and the Pakistani and Afghan war lords can fall prey to psychological warfare, why would anyone think political combatants like U.S. Congressmen would be any different?
The Army just got caught with their hand in the cookie jar!
I'd like to be outraged, but I'm not. I'd also like to think our Senators would be beyond being so duped, but then I recall the whole Iraq war fiasco and how this country, including its Senators, were duped into going to war in the first place, so that doesn't surprise me either.
What does surprise me is how much we've risen in the influence-peddling, arm-twisting game. In the old days, luring a Senator into a compromising sexual tryst or a drunken binge were the easiest ways to insure a particular Congressman's cooperation on an army war request, but nowadays, I guess those tactics won't work. After looking at the list of targeted Senators, I initially thought that maybe, given their advanced ages, sex and booze were no longer a temptation, but then I realized that in today's Congress, neither would necessarily end a Congressman's career if his or her seat was a safe seat, so sex and alcohol were no longer useful for political blackmail. Mind games were probably the Army's only alternatives.
The Army really shouldn't fret over this incident. The American people have a proclivity for being duped in the political arena, so by next week, this scandal will have run its course and we'll have moved onto some other hot-button issue with no real meaning in the general scheme of things. I'd like to blame that fact on the Army too, but something tells me they're too smart to acknowledge any role in it.
The Army just got caught with their hand in the cookie jar!
I'd like to be outraged, but I'm not. I'd also like to think our Senators would be beyond being so duped, but then I recall the whole Iraq war fiasco and how this country, including its Senators, were duped into going to war in the first place, so that doesn't surprise me either.
What does surprise me is how much we've risen in the influence-peddling, arm-twisting game. In the old days, luring a Senator into a compromising sexual tryst or a drunken binge were the easiest ways to insure a particular Congressman's cooperation on an army war request, but nowadays, I guess those tactics won't work. After looking at the list of targeted Senators, I initially thought that maybe, given their advanced ages, sex and booze were no longer a temptation, but then I realized that in today's Congress, neither would necessarily end a Congressman's career if his or her seat was a safe seat, so sex and alcohol were no longer useful for political blackmail. Mind games were probably the Army's only alternatives.
The Army really shouldn't fret over this incident. The American people have a proclivity for being duped in the political arena, so by next week, this scandal will have run its course and we'll have moved onto some other hot-button issue with no real meaning in the general scheme of things. I'd like to blame that fact on the Army too, but something tells me they're too smart to acknowledge any role in it.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
NO MARTYRDOM FOR GADHAFI
The news media outlets are reporting that long-time Libyan dictator, Moammar Gadhafi has defiantly declared that he will die a martyr's death, if necessary, to save his country, but dictators, whether religious or secular oriented, seldom live up to their bravado. Most of them, once they lose power, find themselves shivering with the same kind of fear the people they once brutally oppressed felt moments before their death.
I'm a staunch opponent of the death penalty, even for scum-of-the-earth dictators like Gadhafi, but I have no qualms about stuffing him in a cell with no light and letting him rot. A Martyr's death is too good for the man.
I'm a staunch opponent of the death penalty, even for scum-of-the-earth dictators like Gadhafi, but I have no qualms about stuffing him in a cell with no light and letting him rot. A Martyr's death is too good for the man.
Monday, February 21, 2011
A CATHOLIC LESSON NEVER LEARNED
The February 10th arrest of Msgr. William Lynn of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia highlights, once again, that the Catholic Church hierarchy in America and in Rome do not take seriously the need to protect children from sexual predators in the Roman Catholic clergy. Msgr. Lynn was charged with endangering the welfare of children resulting from a grand jury indictment that he covered up evidence of sexual abuse committed by priests he supervised and moved them to other parishes or schools where they could continue to sexually abuse children.
Despite the ongoing sexual abuse scandal that has rocked the Roman Catholic Church for years, leaders in the billion-strong denomination refuse to admit to systemic problems in dealing with sexual abuse among priests and have demonstrated an incredible lack of understanding of homosexuality, sexual abuse, and pedophilia. The result of their failures is a problem that just won't end.
It's a shame that children attending Catholic institutions have to endure such risk of abuse and that the work of thousands of faithful Catholics clergy gets tainted every time a new scandal is exposed. It's frustrating. It's downright maddening, and it's totally preventable. The truly sad part is that Catholic Church leaders still haven't learned their lesson. Until they do, the abuse will continue.
Despite the ongoing sexual abuse scandal that has rocked the Roman Catholic Church for years, leaders in the billion-strong denomination refuse to admit to systemic problems in dealing with sexual abuse among priests and have demonstrated an incredible lack of understanding of homosexuality, sexual abuse, and pedophilia. The result of their failures is a problem that just won't end.
It's a shame that children attending Catholic institutions have to endure such risk of abuse and that the work of thousands of faithful Catholics clergy gets tainted every time a new scandal is exposed. It's frustrating. It's downright maddening, and it's totally preventable. The truly sad part is that Catholic Church leaders still haven't learned their lesson. Until they do, the abuse will continue.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)